Skip to main content Skip to footer
Menu
ohau wall ohau wall

The Ōhau Diversion Wall

The Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes are taonga – special treasures with deep cultural, ecological and recreational value to our communities, iwi, and visitors.

Through the Rotorua Te Arawa Lakes Programme, Regional Council works alongside Te Arawa Lakes Trust, Rotorua Lakes Council, iwi, central government, and local communities to restore and protect lake health now and for future generations.

One of the tools used was the Ōhau Diversion Wall, a steel structure built in 2007-2008 to help protect Lake Rotoiti by diverting nutrients from Lake Rotorua away from Lake Rotoiti and into the Kaituna River. It was never meant to be a permanent solution, but a temporary measure while longer-term, catchment-based solutions were developed.

Since then, major progress has been made. With community support, we’ve introduced plan changes, helped shift land use practices, phosphorous locking (alum dosing), upgraded wastewater systems, and built wetlands and bunds to naturally filter runoff.

The results are promising, with Lake Rotorua close to reaching its water quality goal.

Where are we now?

Since 2014, the Ōhau Wall has been deteriorating faster than anticipated due to microbial induced corrosion. 

While the Ōhau Wall has leakage, it is still diverting Ōhau Channel water down the Kaituna River as intended. However, it’s ageing faster than initially anticipated, and would cost between $4.8 million and $62 million to repair or replace.

Regional Council is considering the Ōhau Wall’s future and how best to use public funds. This is a long-term decision, and we’ll be using the latest science, community input and government direction to guide the process.

Ultimately, this isn’t just about infrastructure. It’s about legacy – keeping our lakes healthy, resilient and thriving for future generations.

What's next?

Year  

Milestone  

August 2025  

Regional Council to receive report on engagement and trial planning, which includes feedback from Community Technical Panel (CTP) and tangata whenua.  

2026  

Three-yearly dive inspection.   
 Report back on trial results and Wall condition.  

2027  

Climate change modelling via Plan Change 10  

2029  

Three-yearly dive inspection   

2031  

Alum dosing consent expires  

2032  

Three-yearly dive inspection  

2038  

Projected end of life for king piles  

What’s happened?

  • 2014: Accelerated corrosion (Microbial Induced Corrosion (MIC)) was first identified.
  • 2017: A Structural Management Plan was developed and adopted. This includes undertaking regular inspections (including three-yearly dive assessments) and assessing any risks.
  • 2019/20: Repair of the wall; strengthening works completed (the installation of an additional steel waler beam to support the structure).
  • 2020: Holes in the sheet piles became evident. These holes are concentrated within 1m of the water surface and spread consistently along the wall.
  • 2023/2024: Undertook repair trials using polyethene patching. While this was not entirely successful, it provided valuable information on repair issues to be resolved.

Other actions include:  

  • Commissioning WSP to assess repair/replacement options  
  • Engaging with the community and forming a Community Technical Panel (CTP).  

Full details can be found in the FAQs below.

Frequently asked questions

The wall is experiencing Microbial Induced Corrosion (MIC), particularly in the upper sections near the lake surface. MIC occurs when microorganisms, such as sulphate-reducing bacteria, form biofilms on metal surfaces and accelerate corrosion. This process is common in aquatic environments and has led to perforations in the sheet piles, compromising the wall’s ability to divert water effectively.  

Despite the corrosion, is the wall structurally sound?  

Yes. Engineering advice from WSP indicates that the king piles (the structural framework) are sound and expected to remain so until 2038, assuming corrosion continues at the current rate. However, the sheet piles (the interlocking steel panels that form the continuous face of the wall) are failing and allowing leakage, which reduces the wall’s effectiveness in diverting water from Lake Rotorua.  

Did we anticipate the corrosion occurring? Was it due to the materials used?  

The corrosion affecting the Wall (specifically Microbial Induced Corrosion (MIC)) was not anticipated at the time of construction.   

MIC is a complex biological process where microorganisms accelerate the deterioration of metal surfaces, particularly in aquatic environments. It was not well understood or widely accounted for in infrastructure design when the wall was built.   

While the materials used for construction (steel sheet and king piles) were standard for such infrastructure, and considered appropriate and durable materials at the time, the specific environmental conditions in the Ōhau Channel (including water chemistry, microbial activity, and oxygen levels) have contributed to accelerated corrosion. These factors were not fully accounted for in the original design, and the corrosion mechanism only became evident through monitoring initiated in 2014.  

Several options are currently being assessed and costed. These includes ongoing monitoring, various repair solutions, Wall replacement and removal.   

Regional Council is considering these options using a Dynamic Adaptive Pathways Planning (DAPP) approach at a Regional Council meeting on August 7 2025. This method allows for flexible, staged decision-making for current and future Councillors, based on environmental indicators, community input, and future uncertainties, such as climate change and alum consent expiry.   

Costs range from low millions to tens of millions, depending on the option. Funding would come from Regional Council budgets and would need to be determined through future annual or long term planning processes, in consultation with regional communities.  

The Long Term Plan includes $1.9 million over the next two years for trial work.   

Future funding decisions will be made by Regional Council and may involve broader consultation with ratepayers and stakeholders.  

Regional Council holds resource consent RM16-0527, which authorises both the physical structure of the Wall and the diversion of water from Lake Rotorua to the Kaituna River. The consent outlines specific obligations, including:  

  • Maintaining the Wall in good condition, which requires Regional Council to ensure the structural integrity of the Wall is maintained.
  • Undertaking regular structural monitoring (inspections and reporting).  

The consent does not require the wall to:  

  • Be leak-proof  
  • Maintain its original water-diversion effectiveness  
  • Prevent all water from Lake Rotorua entering Lake Rotoiti.  

Are we meeting our obligations of the consent?  

  • Based on current advice and monitoring, we’re meeting our obligations under the resource consent. ‘Good condition’ means our focus is on ensuring the structural integrity of the Wall is maintained, and regular inspections are being carried out as required. While corrosion has reduced the Wall’s water-diversion effectiveness, this does not constitute a breach of consent conditions. 
  • We are also proactively planning trial repairs, and engaging with the community and technical experts to inform future decisions.  
  • Any additional work beyond routine maintenance (such as full-scale repairs) would likely require a new consent application, which Regional Council is prepared to initiate if and when a preferred repair method is confirmed.  

Modelling shows:  

  • The wall was effective when Rotorua’s water quality was poor.  
  • Now, with Lake Rotorua near its TLI target of 4.2, the wall provides only minor improvement to Lake Rotoiti.  
  • In some scenarios, removing the wall leads to similar or better outcomes.  
  • Cyanobacterial species in the Ōhau Channel differ from those in Lake Rotoiti, suggesting leakage is not causing algal blooms.  

What are some of the variables that impact this?  

The following factors will have an influence water quality and the Wall’s future relevance. These will be key considerations as part of Regional Council’s decision-making process.  

  • Climate change impacts on lake health and nutrient cycling.  
  • Alum dosing effectiveness and consent expiry (due 2031)  
  • Catchment land use changes, with an increased work programme since the Wall was constructed to improve water quality in Lake Rotorua.   
  • Community expectations and cultural values.  

Climate modelling is scheduled for completion in 2027 as part of the Plan Change 10 Science Review.  

What other interventions have been made to improve the water quality in Lake Rotorua? 

Major interventions include:  

  • Alum dosing in Utuhina and Puarenga Streams (since 2006 and 2010).  
  • Land use and management changes to reduce nitrogen and other nutrients into the lakes.   
  • Detention dams in the upper catchments to hold back nutrients.   
  • Sewerage reticulation infrastructure by Rotorua Lakes Council.   

Science is sourced from:  

  • University of Waikato modelling  
  • Regional Council monitoring programmes  
  • Cyanobacterial species analysis  
  • Environmental Research Institute (ERI) reports  
  • Plan Change 10 Science Review (due 2027).  

We’ve formed a Community Technical Panel (CTP), including representatives from the Lake Rotoiti community and Lakes Water Quality Society. These individuals were appointed to provide technical input, represent community perspectives, and support the development of engineering options for the Wall.  

Engagement to date includes:  

  • Presentations at community meetings and AGMs  
  • Technical workshops  
  • Ongoing consultation with tāngata whenua  
  • Updates through newsletters and public meetings.  

It is important that we make informed decisions on what level of repair is committed to. We will need to consider the views of the whole Lakes community, as well as the wider ratepayer community, tāngata whenua, and the expert advice on costs, risks, and water quality in the Lakes.